tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7097582791935798204.post8422484666621778346..comments2023-08-02T20:59:22.523+02:00Comments on dianoigo: biblical studies, theology, church history and more: Addendum to 'The Canon Conundrum' by Nathan and Matthew FarrarTomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16671380367019506667noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7097582791935798204.post-67470271779569741802016-08-06T20:26:04.702+02:002016-08-06T20:26:04.702+02:00Jude 5:
Though you already know all this, I want t...<b><a href="https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Jude+1&version=NIVUK" rel="nofollow">Jude 5</a>:</b><br />Though you already know all this, I want to remind you that the Jesus* at one time delivered his people out of Egypt, but later destroyed those who did not believe.<br /><i>* Some early manuscripts Jesus</i><br /><br />According to the Christadelphian narrative, the early manuscripts are pure, before the “Great Apostasy” set it.<br /><br />I had conversation with a Christadelphian woman several years ago. I asked her about “Man from Heaven” and the pre-existence of Jesus. She replied, “It’s a matter of opinion.” This surprised me because that’s not what Christadelphians teach and is a disfellowship offence.<br /><br />The Christadelphians cited this doctrine as a reason why I couldn’t join their ecclesia; an ecclesia she had previously joined with heretical beliefs from their point of view.<br /><br />Either the early manuscripts are bogus or the Christadelphian belief is bogus.<br />Tim Mathiashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16882100775157665757noreply@blogger.com